Posts

Showing posts from December, 2020

AT LEAST 20,733 % HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE BIBLE!

  AT LEAST 20,733 % HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THE BIBLE! How much was taken or removed or missing from the Holy Bible?... How much is this   what prophet Lehi described as “many” plain and precious things taken from the Book of the Lamb? Calculating by pages, deduct the 36 pages of the merged four gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, from the total number of 7,500 pages of the Lord’s   Book, you will have 7,464 pages missing… taken away by the whore apostate Church… willfully and intentionally to cause the nations to err and stumble! That is the first idea to show you how huge (!) are the things the apostate church has taken away! When you proceed to the other books, in the case of those dictated to Jakob Lorber, there is also “The Household of God” in three volumes, over 1,500 pages in all, which is the true history of the Old Testament time; the books which records what has been going on the the beyond after death such as “Bishop Martin,” “From Hell to Heaven,” “Robert Blum”

THE LIVING GOD

THE LIVING GOD To all God-worshippers especially the Catholic, Think of this… analyze this: What does the phrase “Living God” mean to you? “That He is alive? That He is somewhere?” What else? “That He is out there?” What more specifics? That His ears are listening to your request and wishes, not closed like the ears of the idol that cannot hear, And that His mouth is not mute like the mouth of the idols, but talks or communicates to you, either verbally or telepathically, that is, mentally or emotionally. In short, there is a two-way communication between you and Him. Now, there is a growing number of men and women, few in comparison to the general public, who claim to be having this two-communication with God, not always in the same way, but some receive God’s word by hearing a voice between their ears and heart; others by receiving thoughts; others via message in nature; others by exact verse in the Bible to what they are seeking; perhaps because they are more s